<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Upgrading to Wordpress 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2006/01/09/upgrading-to-wordpress-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2006/01/09/upgrading-to-wordpress-20/</link>
	<description>Resources for librarians who are interested in the application of web design and technologies in libraries</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tangognat</title>
		<link>http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2006/01/09/upgrading-to-wordpress-20/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>tangognat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/?p=381#comment-904</guid>
		<description>The WYSIWYG editor seems a little off to me, or I'm just not used to it yet. It does feel as if the software runs faster after the upgrade. I do very much like the ability to resize the editing window, and the live preview of showing your post in process as it would appear on the page is very nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WYSIWYG editor seems a little off to me, or I&#8217;m just not used to it yet. It does feel as if the software runs faster after the upgrade. I do very much like the ability to resize the editing window, and the live preview of showing your post in process as it would appear on the page is very nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
