<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikis and Access control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2006/08/11/wikis-and-access-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2006/08/11/wikis-and-access-control/</link>
	<description>Resources for librarians who are interested in the application of web design and technologies in libraries</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Information Wants To Be Free &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What are wikis good for?</title>
		<link>http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2006/08/11/wikis-and-access-control/#comment-11205</link>
		<dc:creator>Information Wants To Be Free &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What are wikis good for?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2006/08/11/wikis-and-access-control/#comment-11205</guid>
		<description>[...] Karen Coombs beat me to the punch with an excellent post on a Web4Lib comment I had noticed recently as well: &#8220;I am repeatedly impressed by how often, when librarians consider wikis, their first thought seems to be of access control. The idea of “just anybody being able to edit our Web pages” seems somehow innately abhorrent. It leads me to wonder if they “get” the very idea of a wiki.&#8221; (original post from Web4Lib) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Karen Coombs beat me to the punch with an excellent post on a Web4Lib comment I had noticed recently as well: &#8220;I am repeatedly impressed by how often, when librarians consider wikis, their first thought seems to be of access control. The idea of “just anybody being able to edit our Web pages” seems somehow innately abhorrent. It leads me to wonder if they “get” the very idea of a wiki.&#8221; (original post from Web4Lib) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
