<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redesign mayhem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2007/05/08/redesign-mayhem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2007/05/08/redesign-mayhem/</link>
	<description>Resources for librarians who are interested in the application of web design and technologies in libraries</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2007/05/08/redesign-mayhem/#comment-24646</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 01:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2007/05/08/redesign-mayhem/#comment-24646</guid>
		<description>My guess would be that if you have a good and prominent search box, your architecture won't be as significant.  I'm not sure if that's good or bad, though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess would be that if you have a good and prominent search box, your architecture won&#8217;t be as significant.  I&#8217;m not sure if that&#8217;s good or bad, though :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
