<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bias, Objectivity and Authority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2007/06/22/bias-objectivity-and-authority/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2007/06/22/bias-objectivity-and-authority/</link>
	<description>Resources for librarians who are interested in the application of web design and technologies in libraries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:55:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Houghton-Jan (LiB)</title>
		<link>http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2007/06/22/bias-objectivity-and-authority/comment-page-1/#comment-27091</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Houghton-Jan (LiB)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2007/06/22/bias-objectivity-and-authority/#comment-27091</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m happy to be disagreed with on this, but I think many people are reading more into my post than is actually there.  And a lot of people haven&#039;t even read the original post, and are just going off of the comments others make.  You can certainly talk with a vendor.  You have to in order to get stuff.  You can certainly write for a journal that pays you.  But is the journal telling you to write about a particular topic, perhaps one that shows their sister companies in a favorable light?  Or is the vendor buying you dinner and giving you gifts to try to get you to buy their product?  This is where I have a problem.  And I agree--one can&#039;t be perfectly objective.  I never said that one could.  It&#039;s impossible.  But there certainly are things that reduce one&#039;s objectivity.  That was my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m happy to be disagreed with on this, but I think many people are reading more into my post than is actually there.  And a lot of people haven&#8217;t even read the original post, and are just going off of the comments others make.  You can certainly talk with a vendor.  You have to in order to get stuff.  You can certainly write for a journal that pays you.  But is the journal telling you to write about a particular topic, perhaps one that shows their sister companies in a favorable light?  Or is the vendor buying you dinner and giving you gifts to try to get you to buy their product?  This is where I have a problem.  And I agree&#8211;one can&#8217;t be perfectly objective.  I never said that one could.  It&#8217;s impossible.  But there certainly are things that reduce one&#8217;s objectivity.  That was my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L</title>
		<link>http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2007/06/22/bias-objectivity-and-authority/comment-page-1/#comment-26600</link>
		<dc:creator>L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarywebchic.net/wordpress/2007/06/22/bias-objectivity-and-authority/#comment-26600</guid>
		<description>I think one of the things that the librarianinblack post misses is that it assumes the vendor/client is one-sided and that the client is the only one swayed by friendship or likability. Sure, the vendor rep is a salesperson, but I would assert that their regard for you (the client) endears you to them on an interpersonal level. They can be swayed to make a better deal based on their friendship with you - it&#039;s a two-way street. 

You need to have an honest rapport with the vendor from the start and tell them what works for you and what doesn&#039;t. It&#039;s the only way both sides can be truly happy. If you get sold a pile of crap, you&#039;re going to tell every librarian that will listen about the pile of crap. Your happiness and your positive word of mouth still have value. In the vendors I&#039;ve dealt with, they understand that I will be brutally honest, and I feel they respect that.

I&#039;ve also had some very good meals at their expense - I still sleep well at night!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one of the things that the librarianinblack post misses is that it assumes the vendor/client is one-sided and that the client is the only one swayed by friendship or likability. Sure, the vendor rep is a salesperson, but I would assert that their regard for you (the client) endears you to them on an interpersonal level. They can be swayed to make a better deal based on their friendship with you &#8211; it&#8217;s a two-way street. </p>
<p>You need to have an honest rapport with the vendor from the start and tell them what works for you and what doesn&#8217;t. It&#8217;s the only way both sides can be truly happy. If you get sold a pile of crap, you&#8217;re going to tell every librarian that will listen about the pile of crap. Your happiness and your positive word of mouth still have value. In the vendors I&#8217;ve dealt with, they understand that I will be brutally honest, and I feel they respect that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also had some very good meals at their expense &#8211; I still sleep well at night!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
